Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  121 / 290 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 121 / 290 Next Page
Page Background

References

1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in

elderly people.

The Lancet

. 2013, 752

62.

2. Coelho T, Paúl C, Gobbens RJJ, Fernandes L. Multidimensional

frailty and pain in community dwelling elderly.

Pain Medicine

(United States)

. 2015.

3. Kaye AD, Baluch A, Scott JT. Pain management in the elderly

population: a review.

Ochsner J

. 2010;10(3):179

87.

4. Gobbens RJJ, van Assen MALM, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT,

Schols JMGA. The tilburg frailty indicator: Psychometric properties.

J Am Med Dir Assoc

. 2010;11(5):344

55.

5. Becker J, Schwartz C, Saris-baglama RN, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB.

Using item response theory (IRT) for developing and evaluating the

Pain Impact Questionnaire (PIQ-6TM).

Pain Med

. 2007;8(Suppl.3).

6. Pfeiffer E. A Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ).

J Am Geriatr Soc

. 1975;23(10):1975.

P-325

Outcomes in a multicomponent exercise programme in frail

community-dwelling individuals

I. Anton, E. Andueza, S. Raposo, X. Embil, J. Yanguas.

Fundación Matia.

Hospital Ricardo Bermingham

Introduction:

The purpose of this program is to examine if a super-

vised multicomponent exercise program (MEP) in frail elderly people

can improve functionality and cognitive status, as well as reduce falls.

Methods:

This is a prospective intervention of 38 frail elderly

(September 2014

March 2016). The inclusion criteria were balance

problems and/or previous falls. The exclusion criteria were to suffer

from moderate and sever dementia. MEP includes propioception,

balance (balance carpet) and strength (leg press machine) exercises

for 60 minutes, twice a week during 12 weeks. We have done pre

and post intervention assessment of functional and cognitive values.

The functional values were SPPB (short physical performance battery),

gait velocity, balance carpet, falls and maximal dynamic strength (RM)

measured in kilograms. The cognitive values were MEC (spanish

adapted version of MMSE), TMT a, TMT b and two dual cognitive tasks

(walk while name animals and walk while substracting).

Results:

Of 38 elderly, average age 80, females 51%, barthel 94, lawton

5.46, affective disorders 43%, BMI 25.81, drugs number 5.11, no. of falls

6 months previous to the program 1.24, no. of falls during the program

0.30, poor sleep quality 43%, mild cognitive impairment 10%, mild

dementia 2.7%. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon

signed ranks test. We found statistical significant differences pre/post

intervention in SPPB (8.46; 9.35 p = 0.002), balance carpet (278/300;

294/300 p < 0.001), lower-body RM (34.35; 53.22) with an improve-

ment of 54%, gait velocity 6 m (0.81 m/s; 0,95 m/s p < 0.05) and no.

of falls (1.24; 0.30 p = 0.006). We didn

t find statistical significance of

the rest of results (TMTa, TMTb, MEC and dual cognitive tasks

gait

velocity aritmetic task and gait velocity verbal task-).

Conclusions:

MEP shows improvements in functional measurements,

reduce falls but not improvements in single and in dual cognitive tasks.

P-326

Evaluation of a hospital at home service in older patients with

frailty

M. Azad

1

, S. Rutter

2

, T. Masud

1

.

1

Nottingham University Hospitals

NHS Trust, Nottingham,

2

Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Trust,

Sutton-In-Ashfield, UK

Introduction:

Emergency admissions to hospital of older people have

increased substantially over the last decade, with many of them being

frail. Simultaneously, acute hospital bed numbers have reduced

thereby putting extra pressure on services. Hospital at Home (HAH)

interventions provide active treatment by health and social care

professionals in patients

own homes. The aim of this study was to

evaluate the effectiveness of a HAH service in frail and non-frail older

patients.

Methods:

Community dwelling older people, at risk of hospital

admission, were referred to a HAH service from a variety of community

sources. The service comprised regular assessments and appro-

priate interventions by a multidisciplinary team including a doctor.

We measured the total duration of the HAH service and the proportion

of people whose care was transferred to another setting. Frailty status

was measured using the Groningen Frailty Indicator.

Results:

Forty four patients (61.4% female) were evaluated with a

mean age of 80.9 years (SD = 8.3; range = 63

95). The mean inter-

vention time was 15.3 days (95%CI = 12.1

18.5). The proportion of

participants classified as frail were 70.5% (95%CI = 68.4

72.5%; n = 31).

The proportion of frail patients who remained at home were 71% (95%

CI = 68.1

73.8%; n = 22) compared with 76.9% (95%CI = 70.6

83.3%;

n = 10) of those without frailty [NS].

Conclusions:

These data suggest that a HAH service comprising

members of a team that can deliver comprehensive geriatric assess-

ment can effectively manage older people with frailty in their own

homes. Such a service has the potential to ease demand on a pres-

surised acute hospital care system, and warrants further research.

P-327

Prevalence of sarcopenia in patients referred to a secondary care

falls clinic

K. Barnes

1

, B. Smeed

1

, R. Taylor

1

, E. Blackshaw

1

, K. Brooke-Wavell

3

,

A. Slee

4

, V. Hood

2

, J. Ryg

5

, T. Masud

2

.

1

NUH NHS Trust,

2

University of

Nottingham, Nottingham,

3

Loughborough University, Loughborough,

4

United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincolnshire, England,

5

University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Introduction:

Sarcopenia is characterised by loss of skeletal muscle

mass and strength with evidence of adverse outcomes such as physical

disability, poor quality of life and death. Both low muscle mass and

sarcopenia are independent risk factor for falls, although there are few

data available on the prevalence of sarcopenia in fallers. This study

aimed to determine the prevalence of sarcopenia in older people

referred to a falls clinic.

Method:

Consecutive patients referred to a multidisciplinary second-

ary care falls unit were recruited. Sarcopenia was diagnosed using the

European Working Group on Sarcopenia (EWGSOP) definition (both

low muscle mass and function) and cut-off points. Bio-impedance

(BIA) was employed to measure muscle mass (SMI), gait speed and

grip strength were assessed as the functional measures.

Results:

Fifty-three patients (62.3% = women) were recruited. Mean

grip strength for women and men were 17.9 (SD = 5.0) and 29.9

(SD = 9.0) kg, and mean gait speeds were 0.61 (SD = 0.18) and 0.75

(SD = 0.38) m/s respectively. Six were unable to undergo BIA (2

had pacemaker, 4 unable to stand still). Mean BIA in women and men

were 7.0 (SD = 1.0) and 7.7 (SD = 1.0) kg/m

2

respectively (p = 0.018).

Prevalence of sarcopenia was 41.5% (95%CI = 27.4

55.6%; n = 22).

Conclusion:

Sarcopenia, as measured by BIA, is common in older

people referred to a secondary care falls clinic. BIA was simple to

perform in this setting, although further validation against gold

standard methods in this population are lacking. As nutritional and

exercise interventions for sarcopenia are now available, simple

methods for diagnosing sarcopenia in fallers should be considered.

P-328

Preliminary results of a systematic review focusing on the

effectiveness of the interventions in preventing the progression of

frailty in older adults

E. Bobrowicz-Campos

1

, J. Apóstolo

1

, R. Cooke

2

, S. Santana

3

,

M. Marcucci

4

, A. Cano

5

, M. Vollenbroek-Hutten

6

, B. D

Avanzo

7

,

C. Holland

2

.

1

ESEnfC Coimbra, Portugal;

2

ARCHA Aston University,

Birmingham, UK;

3

DEGEI, University of Aveiro, Portugal;

4

Geriatric Unit,

Fondazione IRCCS Ca

Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico & DISCCO,

University of Milan, Milan, Italy;

5

Dept. of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, and

Gynaecology, Universitat de Valência, Spain;

6

RRD, Netherlands;

7

IRCCS

Istituto Di RicercheFarmacologiche

Mario Negri

Poster presentations / European Geriatric Medicine 7S1 (2016) S29

S259

S115