Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  118 / 290 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 118 / 290 Next Page
Page Background

P-314

Advance Care Planning (ACP) as exit strategy beyond frailty:

respecting View of the Patient, Integrated Care System Planning

Association/Assembly (VIP-AA) and Preventing, Avoiding,

Postponing or Reducing Frailty Program (PAPRFP) in Japan

K. Senda, S. Satake, M. Nishikawa, S. Takanashi, S. Sakakibara,

K. Kinoshita, Y. Iida, I. Kondo, H. Endo, H. Miura.

National Center for

Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan

Introduction:

Continuous discussion of advance care planning (ACP)

between patient and care team throughout from pre-frailty to end-of-

life (EOL), is a fundamental of EOL care (EOLC) standing at the view of

the patient. That is consistent with patient-centered care principle.

Methods:

Organizing-committee (OC) for Preventing, Avoiding,

Postponing or Reducing Frailty Program (PAPRFP) for community

dwelling seniors and outpatients in National Center for Geriatrics and

Gerontology, was established in February 2014. Respecting View of the

Patient, Integrated Community Care System Planning Association/

Assembly (VIP-AA) was founded in 2015 and held inter-disciplinary

seminars for ACP promotion, for 3 times with pioneers in EOLC

standing at the view of the patient in 2015, and once for local health

and long-term care community in 2016.

Results:

Pilot study group of PAPRFP was consisted of 21 female and

14 male; 78.2 ± 6.7 years. Participants were satisfied with PAPRFP

contents and interested in advanced course. OC recognized serious

needs of senior people nearing frailty for ACP, because preventing

frailty has limitation. On VIP-AA seminars, 68 participants learned

ACP in Obu; 155, Kyoto; 53, Tokyo, 2015 and 48 participants in Obu,

March 2016. Almost every participant gave positive feedback and

agreed with promotion for ACP in Train-the-Trainer strategy.

Conclusions:

ACP promotion could be an essential element of

Integrated Community Care System for the Elderly

to continue

living with a sense of security in the most aged society, Japan. VIP-AA

advocates that ACP is exit strategy beyond frailty and PAPRFP is

entrance strategy for high-quality EOLC initiating ACP.

P-315

Patients

views on the impact of multidrug-resistant bacteria

(MRB) in end-of-life care

Results of a qualitative study using

principles of Grounded Theory

A. Sturm

1,2

, C. Sieber

1,2

.

1

Institute for Biomedicine of Aging (IBA),

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Nürnberg,

2

Department of General Internal and Geriatric Medicine, Hospital of the

Order of St. John of God, Regensburg, Germany

Objectives:

The impact of infection and colonization with MRB on

patients in palliative and geriatric wards is mostly unknown. Existing

research data from a general population cannot be transferred to a

population in need of end-of-life care. Therefore, an interdisciplinary

team realized

M-EndoL

MRSA in End-of Life Care

. It aims at

developing a patient- and family-centered approach to handle MRB,

taking into account the needs of hospitalized patients, relatives,

professional caregivers and healthcare institutions. The study at hand

is a subproject that focuses on patients

reports and aims at assessing

the impact of MRB as experienced by the patients.

Methods:

Using a semi-structured questionnaire, we interviewed 43

patients in order to explore the consequences of MRB regarding

information, communication, ailments, therapy and contact precau-

tions. Verbatim transcripts were inductively analyzed using principles

of Grounded Theory. Additionally, we report insights of a focus group

discussion.

Results:

The impact of MRB varies widely. It ranges from no impact

to individually experienced consequences relating to the patient´s

physical constitution, social-life and emotional state. The impact often

depends on a patient´s health status and MRB-history, main diagnosis

and family situation. As they experience the impact, patients copewith

this situation as individuals.

Conclusion:

The results suggest individual approaches when deal-

ing with geriatric and palliative patients. Team members and

institutional stakeholders should be aware that patients might be

upset and even burdened by positive MRB-findings and the required

contact precautions. Patient

s suggestions imply that they would

benefit from comprehensible information, empathic communication

and individual support.

The project is funded by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und

Forschung (BMBF: Versstud12-1-032). There are no conflicts of

interest to be reported.

P-316

What is the relationship between socio-economic status and

quality of end-of-life care? Preliminary results of cross-sectional

data from the PACE study

K. Szczerbińska

1

, A. Pac

1

, V. Kijowska

1

, A. Stodolska

1

, I. Barańska

1

,

H. Finne-Soveri

2

, G. Gambassi

3

, B. Onwuteaka-Philipsen

4

, S. Payne

5

,

N. Van Den Noortgate

6,7

, M. Vernooij-Dassen

8

, L. Deliens

6,7

, L. Van Den

Block

6

, on behalf of the PACE group.

1

Jagiellonian Univ. Medical College,

Poland;

2

National Inst. for Health&Welfare, Finland;

3

Univ. Cattolica del

Sacro Cuoro, Italy;

4

EMGO, Expertise Center for Pall.Care, VU Univ.,

Netherlands;

5

Int. Observatory on End-of-Life Care, Lancaster Univ., UK;

6

End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Univ. Brussel (VUB) & Ghent Univ.,

7

Ghent Univ. Hospital, Belgium;

8

Radboud Univ. Medical Center,

Nijmegen, Netherlands

Introduction:

PACE project (

Comparing the effectiveness of Palliative

Care for Elderly people in long-term care facilities in Europe

funded

by the EU 7th Frame Programme) was set up to assess effectiveness

and quality of end-of-life care for nursing home (NH) residents across

European countries: Belgium, Finland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland and

United Kingdom.

Objectives:

The aim of this analysis is to study the relationship

between socio-economic status and quality of end-of-life care for NH

residents as assessed by their relatives.

Methods:

The PACE study was conducted in 2015 by recruiting a

random sample of 322 NHs in 6 countries. A total of 1,622 deceased

residents were identified in 3 months

period prior to contact with the

facilities. A questionnaire including items regarding socio-economic,

educational and demographic characteristics of deceased residents

and their relatives and measures of quality of end-of-life care

(Satisfaction with Care End-of-Life in Dementia scale) was sent to

the relatives.

Results:

Across all countries, 840 (58.0%) relatives responded. Cross-

national analysis will be presented to show possible factors associated

with quality of end-of-life care. We will consider: age, gender, educa-

tion, financial situation, ethnicity and religion affiliation of deceased

NH residents, as well as characteristics of their relatives including:

age, gender, marital status, education, employment, religion affiliation,

relationship with resident, engagement in care, emotional, physical

and time burden.

Conclusions:

Preliminary results will be presented of socio-economic

status of deceased nursing home residents and their relatives and

the association of these factors with quality of care at end of life as

assessed by relatives.

P-317

Systematic exposure experience as a condition for person-centered

care

K. Versluys

1

, S. Janssens

2

, M. Grypdonck

3

, R. Piers

1

, N. Van Den

Noortgate

1

, L. Vanlaere

4

.

1

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Ghent

University Hospital, Ghent,

2

Howest University of Applied Sciences,

Courtrai,

3

Department of Public Health, University Center of Nursing and

Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent,

4

sTimul Ethics of Care Lab, Moorsele,

Belgium

Introduction:

Person-centered care requires appropriate attitudes

of the caregivers. To foster these attitudes, a systematic exposure

experience for geriatric caregivers, using an open interview with a

patient followed by a reflection process, was set up.

Poster presentations / European Geriatric Medicine 7S1 (2016) S29

S259

S112