Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  104 / 290 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 104 / 290 Next Page
Page Background

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), for patients with slight or no cognitive

impairment, and the Pain Assessment In Advanced Dementia Scale

(PAINAD) for patients with moderate-severe cognitive impairment.

The Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) was used to

evaluate mood, and the Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) to evaluate the

quality of life.

Results:

Prevalence of pain evaluated by NRS was 47.7% at T0 and

39.6% at T1, while it was 50.7% at T0 and 44.4% at T1 in patients with

cognitive impairment and evaluated by PAINAD. 42.8% of people with

pain did not receive adequate pain treatment at T0. The statistical

analysis showed that the pain was correlated with depression

symptoms assessed with CSDD (Pearson

s chi-square: 0.000,

Cramer

s V:0.000), and poor quality of life (Pearson

s chi-square:

0.000, Cramer

s V: 0.000).

Conclusion:

Self-report tools alone are not sufficient to assess pain in

elderly people; therefore, observational tools for pain should be used

in a multidimensional assessment of pain. Chronic pain can cause

depression, and a poor quality of life if not adequately treated.

AknowledgementsCalabria: RSACasa Amica, RSA, Villa Elisabetta, Casa

Protetta S. Domenic, Casa Protetta Madonna del Rosario, Casa Famiglia

Anatello RSA Santa Maria del Monte, Casa Protetta San Pio, Casa

Protetta Villa Azzurra; Emilia Romagna: RSA Villa Giulia RSA Villa

Serena, RSAVilla Margherita, RSAVilla Sorriso, RSAVilla Ranuzzi, RSA

Villa Salus, RSA I Platani, RSA S. Anna, RSAVilla Paradiso; Lazio: RSA

Bellosgurado, RSA Santa Rufina, Anagnino Residence, RSA Colle

Cesarano, RSA Corviale; Toscana: RSA Villa Gisella, RSA Le Magnolie,

RSAVilla Michelangelo, RSA La Meridiana.

P-261

Can we decide based on age?

eldery under treatment

M. Malheiro

1

, A. Felix

1

, C. Rodriguez

1

, A. Pissarra

1

, D. Cardoso

1

,

M. Miguens

1

, L. Fernandes

1

, D. Alberca

1

, A. Plácido

1

, A. Martins

1

.

1

Medical Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental - Hospital São

Francisco Xavier

Introduction:

Last years, average life expectancy increased and cancer

is overcoming the cardiovascular disease as the main cause of death.

Decision to treat should promote life quality in this group. Thus, the

treatment of cancer in elderly becomes a challenge in clinical practice.

Objectives:

Characterize patients over 85 years with advanced stage

cancer, therapeutic approach, results and complications.

Material and methods:

Retrospective, observational, descriptive

study of patients aged 85 or older, with advanced stages cancers,

treated with chemotherapy (CT) or hormonotherapy (HT). Data

collected from medical records and processed using Microsoft Excel.

Results:

We studied 13 patients, median age: 88 years, minimum: 85

and maximum: 101 years. Performance Status (PS): 0

1. All female.

Most had breast cancer (84.6%; n = 11), 2 had colorectal, 1 kidney and 1

ovary. 4 patients treatedwith QT. Toxicity observed in 3 patients,1 with

pulmonary thromboembolism (grade 4) and 2 with diarrhoea (grade

3). We emphasize three cases. MPB, 101 years, female; PS 1; metastatic

breast carcinoma in 2010, with letrozole for 5 years without

complications and stable disease. MJR, 86 years, metastatic kidney

carcinoma in 2006, PS 1, treatedwith pazopanib, dose reduction due to

toxicity, partial response (remission of the lung metastases). CGPD, 86

years, PS 1, colon adenocarcinoma, treated with capecitabine (20%

dose reduction), maintaining good tolerance.

Conclusion:

Age shouldn

t limit treatment if integrated with type of

tumour ECOG PS and comorbilities. There were patients treated for 4

years, with disease stability without limiting adverse events.

P-262

A challenge in oncogeriatrics: is Rockwood frailty index an accurate

tool to predict clinical outcomes?

F. Monacelli

1

, C. Russo

1

, M. Canepa

1

, T.G. Casaleto

1

, A. Mazzeo

1

,

S. Sambuceti

1

, R. Murialdo

2

, A. Nencioni

1

, A. Ballestrero

2

,

E. Romairone

3

, S. Scabini

3

, F. DeCian

4

, F. Boccardo

5

, P. Odetti

1

.

1

IST Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties Section of

Geriatric Medicine (DIMI), IRCCS University Hospital San Martino,

University of Genoa,

2

IST Department of Internal Medicine and Medical

Specialties, Section of Internal Oncological Medicine (DIMI), IRCCS

University Hospital San Martino, University of Genoa,

3

IRCCS University

Hospital San Martino-IST Oncological Surgery and Implantable Systems,

4

IST Surgery Clinics, Department of Surgical Science and Integrated

Diagnostics (DISC), IRCCS University Hospital San Martino, University of

Genoa,

5

IST Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties

Section of Medical Clinical Oncology (DIMI), IRCCS University Hospital

San Martino, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

Objective:

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is the gold

standard for elderly assessment in oncology to predict chemotherapy

tolerance and the main clinical outcomes (survival, functional status

and quality of life). CGA is also able to stratify elderly patients accord-

ing to their biological condition (frail, pre-frail, fit). However, the

method is of specialist expertise and it is still poorly incorporated

into routine clinical practice. So far, other assessment tools did not

show adequate specificity and predictive accuracy. We aimed at

comparing different evaluation scales to assess the best predicting

oncogeriatric tool.

Methods:

First visit included ECOG PS, CGA, Rockwood 40 item IF,

Short Form Health Survey-36 (QoL). Patients were assessed after 1

month for mortality, after three and six months for chemotherapy

toxicity and after 12 months for QoL, functional status, and overall

mortality.

Results:

One hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients (78

females, 69 males), with solid tumor, mean age of 78 ± 1.0 years,

were enrolled from May 2015 in an Italian hospital. Respectively, 24%

of patients by ECOG PS, and 61% of patients by CGA were frail.

Interestingly, by IF, 58 patients were frail (39%), 77 pre-frail (52%) and

11 were fit 8 (9%), respectively.

The present study originally showed a significant positive correlation

between Rockwood FI and the gold standard (CGA) (n = 147; R = +0.74,

p < 0.0001). CGA unmasked several clinical problems in 108 out of

147 examined oncogeriatric patients, such as nutritional deficits (39%)

and mood disorders (46%), along with a significant percentage of post

surgical delirium (8%). To date, the overall mortality was of 11% (17/147

patients). The 30-day mortality after surgery was of 4% (2/50 pts).

Conclusions:

The study results indicate a significant correlation

between CGA and Rockwood IF and address a different predictive

accuracy of IF in stratifying the pre frail patients

category. The larger

enrolment and longitudinal observation of the study will allow

identifying the best predicting oncogeriatric tool, improving the

clinical management of the pre frail oncogeriatric patients as well.

P-263

Usefulness of the Multidimensional Prognostic Index to identify

potentially inappropriate prescriptions in hospitalized older

patients

C. Musacchio

1

, M. Rossi

2

, A.M. Mello

1

, A. Cericola

2

, E. Ferelli

2

, V. Arena

2

,

F. Calautti

2

, F. Filauro

2

, E. Zaninoni

2

, S. Garaboldi

1

, E. Zigoura

1

,

R. Custureri

1

, M. Pomata

1

, C. Prete

1

, C.E.A. Fraguglia

2

, A. Pilotto

1

.

1

Geriatrics Unit, Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and

Rehabilitation, Frailty Area, Galliera Hospital, National Relevance and

High Specialization Hospital,

2

Pharmacy Unit, Galliera Hospital, National

Relevance and High Specialization Hospital, Genoa, Italy

Objectives:

Use of multiple drugs is associated with major risks of

potentially inappropriate drug prescriptions (PIPs). Multidimensional

Prognostic Index (MPI) is a validated prognostic tool able to identify

different mortality risk (MPI1 = low, MPI2 = moderate, MPI3 = severe)

in older subjects. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the

MPI may be useful to identify patients with different risk of PIPs in

order to develop tailored strategies to improve drug prescriptions.

Methods:

Subjects aged 65+ years admitted to the Geriatrics Unit

for any acute illness were enrolled. Therapies at admission and at

dischargewere collected. Avalidated computer-based tool was used to

detect any PIPs according to the Screening Tool of Older People

s

Prescription criteria and Micromedex® system to detect major drug

Poster presentations / European Geriatric Medicine 7S1 (2016) S29

S259

S98